Just click the Source button on top and choose a video file.Its available for Windows, Mac, and Linux, and is one of our favorite tools. You only need to care about the Source panel in this step. Youll see the following interface if everything is OK. Double click on the app icon to see whether it can start properly. HandBrake for Mac Guide Step 1: Run HandBrake and Choose a Video Source.Mac Web Galleries lack of log-in account in, 127 selecting as photo source, 35 specifying location of, 126127 Mac computers downloading HandBrake,154. Select the Open Source button on the toolbar to browse your files for a video to open.Getting something that amounts to the “best settings” is a whole lot easier in v0.9.9 and v0.10.M. HandBrake calls the video you already have the Source. Depending on your system settings, a single click may suffice. Launch HandBrake by quickly clicking twice (double-clicking) on the cocktail & pineapple icon.
Guide To Using Handbrake Download And InstallWe’ll start at the more complicated part, and work backwards.The decisions you make during these sections will largely depend on which 2 you choose.Anyway, let’s start at the highlighted area below.Constant Quality (RF) vs Average Bitrate (kbps) Click on Toggle Presets (Mac).Note that since v0.10 is very similar to v0.9.9, I’ve simply updated this guide with v0.10-specific additions in orange (like this!).I’ll use some images this time around to help make things quick & easy. Click the source button and open your file to encode. Though if you want/need to for whatever reason, the old rundown of Handbrake settings (0.9.6) guide should help explain all those options for you in great detail (note that in v0.10 you may need to enable the x264 advanced options panel in the Handbrake settings/preferences located in the drop-down menu).Download and install Handbrake if you do not have it already installed. As understood, endowment does not suggest that you have extraordinary points.The “x264 presets” are now in Handbrake, and 99% of the time, that should mean that you don’t have to dabble in the “x264 Advanced Options Panel”. This is just one of the solutions for you to be successful.I’m really going to be simplifying the rest below (it won’t be 100% technically accurate, but accurate enough to give you an understanding).First, a quick image to give you an idea as to what Constant Quality entails…. Generally speaking, one isn’t going to get you a “nicer” video than the other. Most people aim for something in between. Moving the slider to the extreme left (or using a low enough Average Bitrate), and you can get really small file sizes, but something looking pretty ugly. Move the Constant Quality RF slider far enough to the right (or use a high enough Average Bitrate) and the video will be large, and look indistinguishable from your source.Most people experiment to find an RF value that looks good enough to them at a file size they can handle, and use that RF value most of the time, deviating slightly when need be.RF examples – Here are a couple screenshots taken at different RF settings (one at 20, and one at 30) to give you a very rough starting point (click for a larger view):For a more in-depth look at RF values, check out Comparing x264 “RF” settings in Handbrake (examples) for the full write-up.And an image to give you an idea as to what Average Bitrate entails… (click for a larger image)Average Bitrate – Using this and a calculator, you can aim for a specific file size given a certain video length. If you’ve never used Constant Quality before, normally RF:20 is considered as a starting point for DVD encodes (and RF:22 for BluRay). Sliding to the left (higher numbers) result in lower quality, but lower filesizes too. The downside is that you don’t know how large each video will be until the end.RF – Sliding to the right (lower numbers) lead to better quality. The advantage to Constant Quality is that your videos all tend to look consistent. This targets a certain level of quality throughout your video(s). Or maybe the file size was higher than it needed to be. The downside is that after you finish encoding, you might find out that the filesize you chose wasn’t high enough, and your video looks like junk. Advantage to Average Bitrate is that you can effectively pre-determine your file size. Episode 3: RF22 – 363MB (avg video bitrate of 948kbps) Episode 2: RF22 – 349MB (avg video bitrate of 915kbps) Episode 1: RF22 – 278MB (avg video bitrate of 686kbps) Here’s how it might turn out: Online bitrate calculators are the easiest way to do this.Looking at Constant Quality vs Average Bitrate from another perspective…:Let’s pretend we’re encoding a 1 hour TV series from DVD with constant quality and have determined that RF:22 looks just-good-enough to us. Episode 3: 798kbps (avg video bitrate) – 323.5MB Episode 2: 798kbps (avg video bitrate) – 323.5MB Episode 1: 798kbps (avg video bitrate) – 323.5MB Clearly, Episodes 1 & 4 didn’t need as much bitrate as the others, so they ended up being smaller.Now what if we’d tried using an “average bitrate” instead, targeting exactly 323.5MB per episode? Episode 4 got close to the ideal amount for our “ RF:22 looked good to us” standards and probably looks identical to the RF:22 version from before. Episodes 2 & 3 probably didn’t get enough. The problem is that this time, Episode 1 got more bitrate than it needed. If I were encoding the rest of the season via “average bitrate”, I’d probably be encoding everything at 1000kbps to be on the safe side. So if you use average bitrate, you may have to “pad” your numbers a bit just in case some of your videos need the extra bitrate to look okay. It’s just not consistent when it comes to visual quality – it’s only consistent when it comes to file size. Note that the 3rd setting (very fast) behaves very oddly with Constant Quality and I suggest you avoid using it. Either way, it should look about the same. Using the 7 slowest settings will find ways to fit that quality into a lower file size. Using the 2 fastest settings will result in a larger file size. Changing this won’t substantially affect the quality any further (if you wanted higher quality, move the RF slider more to the right). Play with RF values until you find values where the video looks good enough to you on the devices you play back from, at file sizes you find acceptable.As mentioned above, this has a different effect depending on whether you went with Constant Quality, or Average Bitrate.If you went with Constant Quality, your quality has already been “decided”. And at that point, I’d have been better off using Constant Quality with a better RF value.Short version: Unless you desperately need your file to come out at an exact size, use Constant Quality. The veryslow preset is about the most hard-core anyone should typically get, and it can take a long time even on a quick machine. Going with faster settings here will result in less quality.Details: This is where the time tradeoff comes into play. Going with slower settings here will try to pack more quality into that file size you’ve chosen. Changing this won’t affect the file size any further. ![]() For example, movies like 300 or Saving Private Ryan (the beach scene). It’s something of a middle-road setting.Film – For TV/Movies/Film and 3D animation (Pixar movies for example)Animation – For 2D animation (Mikey Mouse, Simpsons, etc)Grain – For very grainy movies/shows. Nothing inherently wrong with it. To be honest, you don’t have to really understand what they do – other people have done the grunt work figuring them out, so they’re whittled down to pretty simple “one size fits all” settings.None – This is like the “old” Handbrake presets. But a 600MB encode of the same TV show will trounce both of them even if it was done at really fast settings.In general, these focus on shifting “bits” between detailed & flat areas, depending on the setting. Sure, a 350MB TV show encoded at really slow settings will look better than the same 350MB TV show encoded at fast settings. Tori kelly handmade songs album download zipThese stand for “peak signal to noise ratio” and “structural similarity”.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorCarrie ArchivesCategories |